Re - appraising the Tax Exemption of Social Enterprises (SEs) in Malaysia: Selected Tax Exemption Theories
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/home.v7i2.381Keywords:
tax exemption, social enterprise, Income Tax Act, MalaysiaAbstract
Re-appraising the tax exemption of social enterprises (SEs) in Malaysia from a theoretical perspective involves the underlying frameworks that justify the current tax policies applied to SEs. SEs have increasingly become pivotal in addressing societal challenges such as poverty alleviation, environmental sustainability and community development. The approach taken by Malaysian government to taxing SEs has a notable effect in achieving their social goals. One of the significant constraints for SEs in Malaysia is their tax treatment as business entities. Despite their main purpose is for public good, identical to charitable organizations, SEs are subject to taxation like business entities. Particularly, SEs are not entitled for the tax benefit as offered to charitable organizations. The tax regulatory framework does not recognize a SEs by the legal definition and there are no established tax incentives in the current legal framework that are specific to SEs. Despite the clear fact that charity organizations and charitable activities are exempted from tax, there is no tax exemption granted for SEs in Malaysia. Consequently, SEs are treated as business entities under Income Tax Act 1967. This article utilizes the argument to justify tax exemption for SEs in Malaysia. For the purpose of this discussion, this paper applied library research approach combining legal research methodology which mainly involves document analysis such as case law, legal provision and legal theories to see how they might be used to the subject matter. The paper makes a finding that tax exemption for SEs in Malaysia could be justified based on the theories of Public Good Theory, Donative Theory and the Subsidy Theory. By applying this notion, tax exemption should be granted to SEs not only for charitable organizations
References
Abdullah, Apnizan. “Social Based Crowdfunding in Malaysia: The Current Legal Outlook.” Legal Network Series 1 (2019): 1.
Adnan, Raudah Mohd, and Wan Fauziah Wan Yusoff. “The Role of Social Entrepreneurship in Malaysia: A Preliminary Analysis.” Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, no. November (2018): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.11355.
Ahead, One Step. “What Is the Difference between Social Enterprise, NGO and Charitable Organizations?” retrieved from https://osa-advisory.com.hk/en/what-is-the-difference-between-social-enterprise-ngo-and-charitable-organizations/https://osa-advisory.com.hk/en/what-is-the-difference-between-social-enterprise-ngo-and-charitable-organizations/.
Anheier, Helmut K., and Avner Ben-Ner (eds). The Study of the Nonprofit Enterprise: Theories and Approaches. US: Springer, 2003.
Ariffin, Rabiatul Adawiyah Mohd, Zuhairah Ariff Abd Ghadas, and Shahril Nizam bin Md Radzi. “Enhancing Consumer Benefit Via Special Tax Scheme for Social Enterprise.” Yuridika Journal 38, no. 2 (2023): 285–304. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i2.45360.
Bucholtz, Barbara K. “Reflections on the Role of Nonprofit Associations in a Representative Democracy.” Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 7, no. 2 (1998): 555–603. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1236&context=cjlpp.
Bull, Mike. “Reconceptualising Social Enterprise in the UK through an Appreciation of Legal Identities.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research 24, no. 3 (May 11, 2018): 587–605. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2017-0470.
Christians, Allison. “Sovereignty, Taxation and Social Contract.” Minnesota Journal of International Law 18, no. 1 (2009): 99–153.
Colombo, John D. “Using donations to set the boundaries of charitable tax exemption." In National Center on Philanthropy and Law annual conference. Retrieved from https://ncpl.law.nyu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Tab-C-Colombo-paper-1.pdf.
Crimm, Nina J. “An Explanation of the Federal Income Tax Exemption for Charitable Organizations: A Theory of Risk Compensation.” Florida Law Review 50, no. 3 (1998): 419–62. https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1746&context=flr.
Eldar, Ofer. “The Organization of Social Enterprises.” Annual Review of Economics 15 (2023): 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-082222-075249.
Fricke, Michael. “The Case against Income Tax Exemption for Nonprofits.” St John’s Law Review 89, no. 4 (2015): 1130–84. https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6735&context=lawreview.
Hall, Mark A, and John D Colombo. “The Donative Theory of the Charitable Tax Exemption.” Ohio State Law Journal 52 (1991): 1379. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ohslj52&id=1391&div=&collection=journals.
Hines, James R., Jill R. Horwitz, and Austin Nichols. “The Attack on Nonprofit Status: A Charitable Assessment.” Michigan Law Review 108, no. 7 (2010): 1179–1220. https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1642&context=articles.
Hsu, Wei, and Brian P. McAllister. “The Impact of Voluntarily Filing Form 990 on Donations, Government Grants, and Total Contributions.” Journal of Governmental & Nonprofit Accounting XX, no. Xx (2024): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.2308/jogna-2023-002.
Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia. “Guidelines for Approval of Director General of Inland Revenue under Subsection 44(6) of the Income Tax Act 1967,” 2005. Retrieved from http://phl.hasil.gov.my/pdf/pdfam/GP_S44_6_2.pdf.
Lee, Cheng-Wen, Yi Tang Hu, San-Jung Peng, and Hui-Hsin Hsu. “Discussions on Tax-Exemption of Taiwan’s Non-Profit Organizations Based on Diverse Perspectives.” Advances in Management and Applied Economics 12, no. 3 (2022): 49–69. https://doi.org/10.47260/amae/1233.
LHDN. Garis Panduan Bagi Kelulusan Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri Di Bawah Subseksyen 44 (6) Akta Cukai Pendapatan 1967, Pub. L. No. LHDN.01/35/42/51/179 (1967). https://phl.hasil.gov.my/pdf/pdfam/GP_S44_6_1.pdf.
Lim, Ernest. Social Enterprises in Asia: A New Legal Form. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press, 2023.
Louie, Alison. Book Review: The Study of the Nonprofit Enterprise: Theories and Approaches. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764005275217.
MaGIC. “Unleashing the Power of Social Entrepreneurship: Malaysia Social Enterprise Blueprint 2015-2018.” Malaysian Global Innovation and Creativity Centre (MaGIC), 2015. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Mayer, Lloyd Hitoshi, and Joseph R Ganahl. “Taxing Social Enterprise.” Stanford Law Review 66, no. 2 (2014): 387–442. https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2441&context=law_faculty_scholarship.
Peter, Henry, and Giedre Lideikyte Huber. The Routledge Handbook of Taxation and Philanthropy. Edited by Henry Peter and Giedre Lideikyte Huber. 1st ed. London and New York: (Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2021.) https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003139201.
Posner, Eric A, and Anup Malani. “The Case for For-Profit Charities.” 2D Series. (Chicago, 2006.) https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1494&context=law_and_economics.
Radzi, Shahril Nizam Md, Syarizal A. Rahim, Noor Raihani Zainol, Zuhairah Ariff, Munirah Mansyar, and Raja Rosnah Raja Daud. “Special Tax Scheme for Malaysia’s Social Enterprise: An Incentive for Public Good.” In Bahaeddin Alareeni, Allam Hamdan, and Islam Elgedawy (eds), The Importance of New Technologies and Entrepreneurship in Business Development: In The Context of Economic Diversity in Developing Countries, Springer, 2020, 194:1032–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69221-6_79.
Seng, Cheah Sau. “The Determinants of Social Enterprise Performance in Malaysia and Singapore.” Universiti Sains Malaysia, (2018). http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-76887-8%0Ahttp://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-93594-2%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409517-5.00007-3%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2015.06.018%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0877-3%0Aht.
Subačienė, Rasa, Ramunė Budrionytė, Aida Mačerinskienė, and Daiva Tamulevičienė. “Social Enterprises: Evaluation of the Impact of State Support and Corporate Income Exemptions on the State Budget of Lithuania.” Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 6, no. 3 (2019): 1156–71. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.3(7).
Surrey, Stanley S. “Tax Incentives as a Device for Implementing Government Policy: A Comparison with Direct Government Expenditures.” Harvard Law Review Association 83, no. 4 (1970): 705–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/1339837.
Taxation, Joint Committee on. “Historical Development and Present Law of the Federal Tax Exemption for Charities and Other Tax-Exempt Organizations,” 2005. https://www.jct.gov/CMSPages/GetFile.aspx?guid=91d1c71d-866b-4423-84a7-0f1ec352edf8.
Weerawardena, Jay, Robert E. McDonald, Gillian Sullivan Mort. “Sustainability of Non-Profit Organization: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of World Business 45 (2010): 346–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.004
Weisbrod, Burton Allen. “The Future of the Nonprofit Sector: Its Entwining with Private Enterprise and Government.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 16, no. 4 (1997): 541–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199723)16:4<541::AID-PAM2>3.0.CO;2-G.
Weisbrod, Burton Allen. The Voluntary Nonprofit Sector: An Economic Analysis. Lexington Books, 1977.