Parliamentary Threshold In Integrative Legal Perspective: Indonesian Case

  • Sholahuddin Al-Fatih University of Muhammadiyah Malang
Keywords: Parliamentary Threshold, Elections, Integrative, Legal Perspective

Abstract

The article aims at discussing the application of parliamentary threshold legal norms in an integrative legal perspective. Through historical, conceptual and statutory approaches, this study tries to examine holistically and prescriptively the dynamics of applying parliamentary thresholds in legislative elections. This article makes the thinking of leaders on integrative law a benchmark and an analytical knife. The results of this study demostrates that the application of parliamentary thresholds in elections based on an integrative legal perspective is not appropriate because it has not been able to guarantee the fulfillment of a sense of justice for all Indonesians because integrative law views a legal event as a comprehensive state of pros and cons. This research is expected to help academics and legal practitioners, especially with regard to election law to be able to dig out deeper into integrative law, not only from one or two experts, but from several other experts.

References

Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin. “Electoral Regulation in Indonesia : Is It Modern Law ?” Unnes Law Journal 6, no. 2 (2020): 205–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v6i2.41627.
-------. “Akibat Hukum Regulasi Tentang Threshold DalamPemilihan Umum Legislatif Dan Pemilihan Presiden: Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 52/PUU-X/2012 Dan Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013.” Jurnal Yudisial 12, no. 1 (2019): 17–38. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v12i1.258.
Atmasasmita, Romli. 2012. Teori Hukum lntegratif: Rekonstruksi Terhadap Teori Hukum Pembangunan dan Teori Hukum Progresif; Yogyakarta: Genta Publshing
-------. “Memahami Teori Hukum Integratif.” Legalitas 3, no. 2 (2012): 1–13. http://legalitas.unbari.ac.id/index.php/Legalitas/article/view/132/116.
Fatih, Sholahuddin Al. “Implementasi Parliamentary Threshold Dalam Pemilihan Anggota Dprd Provinsi Dan Dprd Kabupaten/Kota.” Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam 6, no. 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.21274/ahkam.2018.6.2.363-388.
———. “Penerapan Threshold dalam Pemilu.” Audito Comparative Law Journal 1, no. 2 (2020): 78–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22219/audito.v1i2.13973.
Kusuma-atmaja, Mochtar. 2006. Konsep-Konsep Hukum dalam Pembangun-an; edited by Otje Salman and Eddy Damian, Bandung: Pusat Studi Wawasan Nusantara, Hukum dan Pembangunan in cooperation with PT. Alumni
Lijphart, Arend. Patterns of Democracy, Government Forms & Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. 2nd ed. Yale: Yale University Press, 2012.
Magee, Rhonda V. “Legal Education as Contemplative Inquiry: An Integrative Approach to Legal Education, Law Practice, and the Substance of the Law We Make.” The Journal of Contemplative Inquiry 3, no. 1 (2016): 7–20.
Mellaz, August. “Praktek Penerapan Keberlakuan 3,5 Persen Ambang Batas Parlemen Secara Nasional Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2012 Tentang Pemilu.” Jakarta, 2012. http://www.spd-indonesia.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Ambang-Batas-Tanpa-Batas.pdf.
Muda, Iskandar. “Penafsiran Hukum Yang Membentuk Keadilan Legal Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah.” Jurnal Yudisial 9, no. 1 (2016): 37–50. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.29123/jy.v9i1.30.
News, Unair. “Teori Hukum Integratif Sebagai Kontribusi Pemikiran Evolusioner Di Indonesia.” Unair, 2019. http://news.unair.ac.id/2019/06/12/teori-hukum-integratif-sebagai-kontribusi-pemikiran-evolusioner-di-indonesia/.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Cetakan ke. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=CKZADwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Marzuki,+Peter+Mahmud,+(2014),+Penelitian+Hukum,+Cetakan+ke-9,+Jakarta:+Kencana+Media+Group.&hl=id&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiNlIjqlbTpAhXWWisKHWktCXAQ6AEIMjAB#v=onepage&q&f=false.
———. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2014.
Radita Ajie. “Batasan Pilihan Kebijakan Pembentuk Undang-Undang (Open Legal Policy) Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Berdasarkan Tafsir Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legislation) Vol. 13, no. No.2 Juni (2016): 111–20.
Right, J. Kim. “Integrative Law.” University of Western Australia Law Review 46, no. 2 (2019): 237–52. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1960.tb78483.x.
Romli Artasasmita. “Tiga Paradigma Hukum.” Jurnal Hukum Prioris 3, no. 1 (2012): 1–26.
Satriawan, Iwan, and Tanto Lailam. “Open Legal Policy Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pembentukan Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 3 (2019): 559–84. http://consrev.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1636.
Sayuti. “ARAH KEBIJAKAN PEMBENTUKAN HUKUM KEDEPAN (PENDEKATAN TEORI HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN, TEORI HUKUM PROGRESIF, DAN TEORI HUKUM INTEGRATIF).” Ar-Risalah 13, no. 2 (2013): 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30631/al-risalah.v13i02.407.
Wulolo, Chastiti Mediafira, and Edward Semuel Renmaur. “MEREDAM KONFLIK DALAM PUSARAN SIBER DALAM PROSES PENETAPAN HASIL REKAPITULASI PEMILU SERENTAK 2019.” Jurnal Penelitian Politik (LIPI) 16, no. 1 (2019): 111–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v16i2.801.
Zakaria, Achmad. “Pembatasan Partai Politik Peserta Pemilihan Umum Dalam Perspektif Demokrasiarya.” Jurnal Idea Hukum 2, no. 1 (2016): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jih.2016.2.1.24.
Published
2021-04-30
How to Cite
Al-Fatih, S. (2021). Parliamentary Threshold In Integrative Legal Perspective: Indonesian Case. Jambe Law Journal, 3(2), 103-117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/jlj.3.2.104-117
Section
Articles