Trademark Ownership by the Local Government of the Special Region of Yogyakarta: A Model for Municipal Ownership of Intellectual Property Rights

  • Budi Agus Riswandi Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Indonesia
Keywords: Ownership, Trademark, Intellectual Property, Local Government Licencing

Abstract

This article aims at elaborating the trademark ownership by the local government in Yogyakarta. As an effort to leverage the region’s historical status in order to add value to products made in this region, the Special Region of Yogyakarta (the “DIY” or the “DIY Government”) has registered its trademarks like “Jogjamark” and “100% Jogja.”  However, there remains a question as to wether the DIY Government have the same rights and obligations concerning intellectual property as private entities, as longa a municipal government is concerned. Generally, a public legal entity is subject to the same laws, with both rights and obligations, as any other legal entity. In this context, the local government of the DIY’s registration of these marks clearly confirms that the Local Government of the DIY is the trademark owner of those trademarks. This registration requires the question as to whether this government entity can legally own registered trademarks or not. In addition, even if the registration is legal, to what extent can the local government use and protect its intellectual property? This paper will address these two issues through an empirical research study, and determines that as a legal entity, the local government can and should own trademarks for the benefit of its population.

References

Adriano, E. A. (2015). The Natural Person, Legal Entity or Juridical Person and Juridical Personality. The Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs, 4(1), 363-391. Retrieved from https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/jlia/vol4/iss1/17/
Aubelj, B. (2003). Pravo, . Ljubljana: Leksikon Cankarjeve založbe.
Balai Pengelolaan Kekayaan Intelektual Dinas Perindustrian And Perdagangan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. (2017). Implementasi Co Branding Pada Produk-Produk Daerah. Balai Pengelolaan Kekayaan Intelektual Dinas Perindustrian And Perdagangan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Balai Pengelolaan Kekayaan Intelektual Dinas Perindustrian And Perdagangan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.
Benito, J. L. (1955). The Legal Personhood of Companies. Private Law Publisher.
Bohinc, R., & Tičar, B. . (2006). Upravno Pravo- Splošni del. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za varnostne vede.
Carnelutti, F. (1955). General Theory of Law . Private Law Publiser.
Grafenauer, B., & Brezovnik, B. . (2006). Javna Uprava. Maribor: Pravna fakulteta.
Kelsen, H. (1967). Pure Theory of Law. (K. Berkeley, Trans.) California: University of California Press.
Lestari, I. S. (2019, November 13). Implementasi Merek Jogjamark and 100%Jogja . (R. A. Putra, Interviewer)
Mihai, G. (2017). Trademark Protection Systems – Use Vs. Registration.Challenges of the Knowledge Society. Intellectual Property Law, 627-639.
Okediji, R. L. (2016). Government as Owner of Intellectual Property? Considerations for Public Welfare in the Era of Big Data. VAND. J. ENT. & TECH. L., 18(2), 331-362. Retrieved from https://www.jetlaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Okediji_SPE_7-FINAL.pdf
Salmond. (1916). Jurisprudence (5th ed.). London: Stevens and Haynes.
Savigny, F. C. (1840). Modern Roman Law System. (J. M. Poley, Trans.) Berlin: Veit.
Shaw, M. N. (2003). International law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, B. (1928). Legal Personality. The Yale Law Journal, 3, 283-299. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/789740
Tičar, B. (2016). Towards an Innovative Classification of Legal Persons. Journal of Criminal Justice and Security, 2, 164‒177. Retrieved from https://www.fvv.um.si/rV/arhiv/2014-2/05_Ticar.pdf
Trstenjak, V. (2003). Pravne osebe. Ljubljana: GV založba.
Viorel Roș, Octavia Spineanu-Matei, Dragoș Bogand. (2003). Dreptul Proprietății Intelectuale. Dreptul Proprietății Industriale. Mărcile și indicațiile geografic. Bucharest: All Beck Publishing.
World Intellectual Property Organization. (1993). Introduction To Trademark Law & Practice ( The Basic Concepts) (A WIPO Training Manual ) (2nd Ed.). Geneva: WIPO Publication.

Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property 1883
Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights 1994
Republic of Indonesia, Act No. 3 of 1950 concerning on the establishment of Special Region of
Yogyakarta as amended for several times by Act No. 9 of 1955 concerning on amendment of Act No. 3 JO. No 19 of 1950 on Establishment of Special Region of Yogyakarta State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1950 No. 3
Republic of Indonesia, Act No. 13 of 2012 concerning on Specialty of Yogyakarta, State Gazette
of the Republic of Indonesia of 2012 No. 170, Additional State Gazette No. 5339Republic
of Indonesia, Act No. 20 of 2016 concerning on trademark and geographical indication, State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2016 No.252, Additional State Gazette No. 5953
Special Region of Yogyakarta Province, Governor Regulation No. 21 of 2017 concerning on The
utilization of Trademark of Jogjamark, 100%Jogja and Jogjatradition as Local Product Co-Branding, Local Gazette of Special Region of Yogyakarta Province of 2017 No. 22.
Published
2021-04-30
How to Cite
Riswandi, B. (2021). Trademark Ownership by the Local Government of the Special Region of Yogyakarta: A Model for Municipal Ownership of Intellectual Property Rights. Jambe Law Journal, 3(2), 165-189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/jlj.3.2.165-189
Section
Articles