Law Enforcement in Banking Criminal Act Involving Insiders
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/jlj.1.1.55-90Keywords:
Banking Crime, Law Enforcement, Insider, Criminal Act, IndonesiaAbstract
The rise of news in the mass media related to burglary cases of bank customer funds further raises public awareness of the vulnerability of the banking sector used as a means (crimes through the bank) and as the target of crime against the bank. On the other hand, the awareness is intended to further convince each party that the bank in conducting its business activities must be managed and managed by parties who have integrity and good competence. The purpose of this research is to: (1) analyze and describe the implementation of the rule of law in handling banking criminal case involving insider; and (2) to know and analyze government efforts both preventive and repressive in handling banking crime cases in Indonesia, especially in cases involving insiders. The results showed that the implementation of law in handling banking crime cases in addition to using Law No. 10 of 1998 on Amendment to Law No. 7 of 1992 concerning to Banking (Banking Act), also used several provisions of article in the Criminal Code (KUHP) and Law No. 20 Year 2011 jo. Law No. 31 Year 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption. The role of Bank Indonesia in the enforcement of law in the form of investigation and/or forensic examination of banking crime that occurred in a bank which then the result of investigation is reported to law enforcement in accordance with applicable Criminal Procedure Code. Enforcement and prevention efforts are conducted jointly through the synergy of Bank Indonesia, the Police and the Attorney. In addition, Bank Indonesia also applied the principle of know your customer and compliance function as a preventive effort for banking crime. The weakness of internal controls is the cause of the ineffectiveness of handling of banking crime cases, especially those involving insiders, a memorandum of understanding between Bank Indonesia, the Police and the Attorney Office is only a moral obligation, should be more binding so that it can become one of the more powerful law enforcement tools.
References
Anwar, H.A.K.Moch, 1986, Tindak Pidana di Bidang Perbankan, Alumni, Bandung
Arrasjid, Chainur, 2011, Hukum Pidana Perbankan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Arsitektur Perbankan Indonesia (API), Bank Indonesia official website, retrieved from http://www.bi.go.id/id/perbankan/arsitektur/Contents/Default.aspx, access on January 2017
Bank Indonesia, www.bi.go.id, access on January 2017
Bank of Indonesia Regulation No.3/10/PBI/2001 concerning Implementation of Know Your Customer Principles dated June 18, 2001 (Peraturan Bank Indonesia No.3/10/PBI/2001 tentang Penerapan Prinsip Mengenal Nasabah (Know Your Customer Principles) tanggal 18 Juni 2001)
Bank of Indonesia Regulation No.3/23/PBI/2001 concerning Amendment to Bank Indonesia Regulation No.3/10/PBI/2001 on Implementation of Know Your Customer Principles dated 13 December 2001 (Peraturan Bank Indonesia No.3/23/PBI/2001 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Bank Indonesia No.3/10/PBI/2001 tentang Penerapan Prinsip Mengenal Nasabah (Know Your Customer Principles) tanggal 13 Desember 2001)
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2014, “Consultative Document: Guidelines Corporate Governance Principle for Banks”, Bank for International Settlement, ISBN 978-92-9131-905-3 (online), http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs294.htm, access on January 2017
BPHN, 1992, “Masalah-Masalah Hukum Kejahatan Perbankan”, Research Report, BPHN Departemen Kehakiman, Jakarta.
Decree of the Minister of Finance No. 792 of 1990 (Surat Keputusan (SK) Menteri Keuangan RI Nomor 792 Tahun 1990)
Denzin, Norman K. dan Lincoln, Yvonna S. (Eds), 2009, Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage Publication, California USA, Translated and Published on Bahasa by Pusataka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.
Dion Bistara & Grace Dwitya Amianti, 2012, “Indonesia Still Struggling with Electronic Fraud: Bank Indonesia”, Online News, edition 6 July 2012, retrieved from http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/archive/indonesia-still-struggling-with-electronic-fraud-bi/, access on January 2017
Ferizal, 2001, “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Bidang Perbankan”, Thesis, Master of Laws, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Hermansyah, 2006, Hukum Perbankan Indonesia, Kencana, Jakarta.
Kustini, Titi, 2012, “Nota Kesepahaman Bank Indonesia, Kepolisian, dan Kejaksaan Sebagai Bentuk Koordinasi Penanganan Tindak Pidana Perbankan”, Buletin Hukum Perbankan dan Kebanksentralan, Vol. 10 Number 1, January-April 2012, Legal Department of Bank Indonesia, Jakarta.
Lash, Nicholas, A., 1987, Banking Law and Regulation: An Economic Perspective, Prentice Hall, USA.
Law No, 23 of 1999 concerning Bank of Indonesia (Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 1999 tentang Bank Indonesia)
Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning Corruption Eradication jo Law Number 20 Year 2001 regarding Amendment to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption (Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi jo Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi)
Law No. 7 of 1992 concerning Banking Principles, as amended by Act Number 10 of 1998 concerning Amendment to Act Number 7 of 1992 concerning Banking (Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 tentang Pokok-Pokok Perbankan, sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 tentang Perbankan)
Mamudji, Sri, et.al., 2005, Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum, Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.
Media Perbankan Bank Indonesia, retrieved from http://www.bi.go.id/id/iek/mediasi-perbankan/tata-cara/Contents/Default.aspx, access on January 2017
Memorandum of Understanding between Bank Indonesia, the Police and the Implementation of the Republic of Indonesia No.13 / 104 / KEP.GBI / 2011, No. B /31/XII/2011, No.Kep-261 /A / JA /12/2011 on Coordination of Handling Banking Crime (SK Handling Tipibank) (Nota Kesepahaman antara Bank Indonesia, Kepolisian, dan Kejaksanaan Republik Indonesia No.13/104/KEP.GBI/2011, No.B/31/XII/2011, No.Kep-261/A/JA/12/2011 tentang Koordinasi Penanganan Tindak Pidana Perbankan (NK Penanganan Tipibank)
Nina Dwiantika, “Inilah 9 Kasus Kejahatan Perbankan”, Online News, edition 3 May 2011, http://bisniskeuangan.kompas.com/read/2011/05/03/09441743/Inilah.9.Kasus.Kejahatan.Perbankan access on January 2017
, “2013, BI Investigasi 62 Kasus Tindak Pidana Bank”, Online News, edition 11 March 2014, retrieved from http://keuangan.kontan.co.id/news/2013-bi-investigasi-62-kasus-tindak-pidana-bank, access on January 2017
Pardede, Marulak, 1995, Hukum Pidana Bank, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta.
Setiadi, Edi, 2010, Hukum Pidana Ekonomi, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta.
Sholehuddin, M., 1997, Tindak Pidana Perbankan, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Sitompul, Zulkarnain, 2004, “Tindak Pidana Perbankan dan Pencucian Uang (Money Laundering)”, Reformasi Hukum, Vol. VII No. 2 July-December 2004.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (PSAK) No. 31 of the Indonesian Institute of Accountants, 1994 (Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan (PSAK) Nomor 31 Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia, 1994)
Suhardi, Gunarto, 2003, Usaha Pembankan dalam Perspektif Hukum, Kanisius, Yogyakarta.
Sutedi, Adrian, 2007, Hukum Perbankan: Suatu Tinjauan Pencucian Uang, Merger, Likuidadi, dan Kepailitan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Triantono, 2013, “Konsep Kepatuhan (Compliance) dalam Sistem Pengawasan Perbankan di Indonesia”, Thesis, Master of Laws, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.
Wiji Nurhayat, “Ini Arti Penting Perbankan di Indonesia Bagi Pemerintah”, Online News, edition 6 January 2014, Online News, retrieved from http://finance.detik.com/read/2014/01/06/110215/2459047/5/ini-arti-penting-perbankan-di-indonesia-bagi-pemerintah, access on January 2017
