Peer Review Process

Submitted manuscripts will be pre-reviewed by the editors, determining whether the manuscripts have conformed to Jambe Law Journal (JLJ)’s submission guidelines. Manuscripts that have conformed to the journal’s style will be peer-reviewed. Jambe Law Journal is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal that involves many reviewers of experts in a relevant field of law. The final decision of manuscript acceptance is solely decided by the editors according to reviewers' comments.


  • Plagiarism and self-plagiarism are not allowed;
  • The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted;
  • An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable;
  • Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.